DS4OERS (PAC) Recommendations to establish a thriving OER community of practice

Drawing on your knowledge and experience of communities of practice (COP), what recommendations do you have to build a thriving community of teachers to create, adopt, and share OER.

  • What resources and tools will be needed by community co-ordinators?
  • What steps are needed to launch and sustain active communities?
  • Are there existing communities that can help promote OER in your region?
  • Do you have any other recommendations to support and promote an OER community of practice?

Please share your ideas by clicking on the reply button below.

Thanks MR mackiwg

I think easily Community is important for use it

1 Like


Great to see you working ahead on the course and welcome to DS4OERS.

Agreed, community is key to promoting OER adoption. Based on your experience, do you have any recommendations or tips to establish an OER community of practice in your country?


I think a successful community of practice requires a shared set of common goals and a willingness to share your own experiences and workarounds for challenges. General examples are the Moodle and RaspberryPi CoPs. In the Pacific, we have the Fiji National University’s nascent Pasifika Wisdom Community.


A Tony

Totally agree.

Both are examples of open communities which foster open and transparent communications. Hopefully the experience of using a variety of open tools in this DS4OERS course will provide ideas for open communication platforms for Pacific teachers to connect.

Have a wonderful day!

1 Like

Building a thriving community of teachers that create, adopt and share OER is very much needed in this online teaching/ digital education era post COVID19 since it is now for students from early childhood to tertiary level. Resources needed would be the technology such as tablets, laptops and smart phones and internet that is fast and readily available at a cheap cost to everyone and data for learning for students and teachers . Here the community coordinators such as Ministry of Education, Internet providers such as Vodaphone and Digicel and most important is generally parents and Principals and teachers can assist through school to provide free or low cost resources and tools. Collaboration and communication with the relevant stakeholders from Government, Ministry of Education, Principals and teachers and the various internet and technology providers is important step which will also be sustainable and in the best interest of our learners (our students). Tertiary institutions like Fiji National University (FNU) and Ministry of Education can promote OER in Fiji. Its very important to create awareness of workshops such as this and other learning modes to teachers around the region and incentives can be given like certificates and professional development registration to encourage them.


I think for developing nations like Fiji, availability of digital tools and experts to conduct ‘‘Training of Trainers’’ is essential to improve digital literacy amongst members of the community, especially with teachers and students.


You are correct in stating that all should have that common interest in creating awareness. I am a member of Wisdom Community of Pasifika Teachers organized by FNU. It is really encouraging to see how they are motivating the teachers during this pandemic to conduct lessons and assessments using different platforms example Zoom and Google forms respectively. They have a great vision.

Thank you.


We have profiled the Wisdom Community of Pasifika Teachers as a regional example of a COP.

Will be interested to hear how this COP can support and promote OER adoption in the region. Zoom and Google forms are valuable tools - but they are not open technologies. This raises an interesting question - can or should we be using closed tools to achieve open goals?

I’m playing “devils advocate” here to seed discussion, thoughts and ideas.

Thanks for your contribution.


Great to meet you ‘again’ Ranjeeta. :slight_smile:

1 Like

Hi @mackiwg, you have raised a pertinent point here! My take on the issue is that, at this point in time, we in the Pacific need to make efficacious use of technologies that are easily/readily available to the masses. When it comes to openness, I would always encourage practitioners /teachers to ‘openly’ share the associated skills and pedagogical practices with others - The processes are equally important. Technological-associated pedagogical practices/skills are easily transferable as well. It is a continuous topic, and thanks for assuming the role of the devil’s advocate. :slight_smile:



The Wisdom Community of Pasifika Teachers COP is an impressive COP actually doing real stuff to support Pacific educators and I commend the leadership of the initiative.

On this point, I respectfully disagree. I don’t think that using tools that are readily available for the masses which subject users to surveillance capitalism are in the best interests of sustainable technology solutions for the Pacific. (Apology - the “devil” is “advocating” :joy:).

I think that WCPT has a unique advantage to play a leadership role in open, and I don’t think the goals of open are easily achieved through closed solutions.

But to be fair - I am an open radical, so expecting a fair share of push back from those preferring closed solutions :wink:

Appreciate your response to what will hopefully become an insightful, productive and constructive discussion for Pacific technology futures in education and how we build and support OER COPs.

Thanks for popping in to say hello @DeepakPrasad.


Bula @mackiwg,
Really appreciate your warm comments re #WCPT, and thanks for your continuous support.

I’d expect nothing less from you :slight_smile: [one open advocate to another]. Having a positive outlook doesn’t mean you never feel the “push back” emotions – I hear you, been there and somewhat still there. I guess the devil is, indeed, in the details, the key seems to be finding the right balance between closed and levels of openness; then we get the best of both worlds ……What do you think? Have a great one!


Excellent question with multiple factors to keep in balance.

As advocates and leaders of open, I believe that we have an obligation to model an “open first” philosophy, for example, always ensuring that there is a Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) option in everything we do. This does not preclude members of the community using proprietary tools thus respecting freedom of choice, but we should not force any learner or educator to sacrifice their personal data by using the so-called “free” tools.

For some educators this can be a challenge, for example, where organizations restrict users from installing software on computers owned by the employer. Also, budget may be a barrier for fledgling communities who may not have the technical expertise or fiscal resources to host FOSS alternatives.

However, the power of open is that we could establish a co-operative model where institutions across the Pacific could donate a little time of their technical staff for administering shared FOSS infrastructure. For example, a BigBlueButton sever for web conferencing, LimeSurvey for online forms, NextCloud using OnlyOffice for collaborative document editing etc.

The DS4OERS course is based entirely on FOSS tools - so it shows it can be done. For example, the Commonwealth of Learning set up a WordPress Multisite instance for the pacificopencourses.col.org website where the DS4OERS course is hosted. The direct cost for this Digital Ocean droplet (the cloud hosting infrastructure) is about $50 per month. We checked server loads and performance yesterday over the last few days for the +1300 learners registered for the course. We are confident this set up could easily scale to support 10,000 learners. My point being, the technology is not expensive, and if we focus on better technical collaboration in the region, we could potentially eliminate the need to use tools that expose our learners to surveillance capitalism.

An open first approach provides the freedom for our region to establish sustainable technology solutions.

Lots to think about and thanks for opening the conversation (pun intended) :innocent:


Deepak Prasad the sessions held by FNU through WCPT and PTKP has been a great support for online teaching such as IVCAM, GOOGLE FORMS, MUTIMEDIA FOR LOW BANDWITH and teaching using ZOOM :100: :heart: The PD registration has encouraged more teachers to be part of it. Teaching online lessons has been a challenge :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: I have used all the lessons learnt via the platform and hoping for more sessions that make my lessons more interesting


We need resources, we need collaboration, we need the support of all major stakeholders for the adoption of this very important tool. We should be looking at the bigger picture and how this move will benefit the region.
The use of existing open technology platforms will boost the process.
I think, we can also work in collaboration with regional institutions such as USP, to assist in the process of adopting the OER which will benefit not only regional teachers but all those who can contribute to the development of a knowledge based society.


In Fiji, we need resources, we need collaboration, we need the support of all major stakeholders for the adoption of this very important tool. We should be looking at the bigger picture and how this move will benefit the region.
The use of existing open technology platforms will boost the process.
I think, we can also work in collaboration with regional institutions such as USP, to assist in the process of adopting the OER which will benefit not only regional teachers but all those who can contribute to the development of a knowledge based society.

1 Like

Hi @premkumar, I noticed that you have submitted a posting that was similar to one of your colleagues. Perhaps something went wrong when trying to respond to the initial post.

It would be great if you could share your view on the topic/discussion.

At last someone has mentioned The University of the South Pacific! Which does subscribe to and support OER repositories… Politics aside! What bodes well for USP is its regional capabilities, so that if national ministeries need support, a regional directive could provide the necessary guidance.

In Papua New Guinea there is The University of Papua New Guinea, another institution who could take on the role, through their networks to promote the use of OERs, as well as a host of Teacher training institutions. But as you can see from this hyperlink, the situation on the ground is complex!

Here in Lae we have The University of Technology of PNG’s Department of Open and Distance Learning. I can see great potential! In particular this workshop which has as its theme " Embracing Technology-enabled Learning and Online Community of Inquiry" But Cannot see the words OPEN anywhere, which doesn’t bode well for us.

Given the current Covid19 pandemic, elections on the 2022 horizon, and ongoing corruption issues, PNG might need a few more years, but will get there with commited individuals, and more women in power! Vote for more women! is more recommendation. lol


Thanks @jackilm

That is an insightful contribution illustrating the strategic complexities of higher education provision in the region.

With full disclosure as UNESCO Chair in OER, I should share that the OER Foundation provides free membership to institutions in the developing world to join the OERu international network through our Outreach Partnership programme.

With reference to PNG, Western Pacific University is already a member and offers the OERu’s Learning in a Digital Age series of open courses. In time, perhaps the other higher education institutions in PNG will also join and leverage the power of sharing open online courses based entirely on OER.

1 Like